Available 24/7 | 0800 088 4170
Available 24/7 | 0800 088 4170
Machinery had already damaged the buried tank before the contractor knew the installation was present. Two questions therefore had to be dealt with before the wider works could safely move forward: how much liquid remained inside the vessel, and what condition the atmosphere inside the petrol tank was in.
Those risks could not be managed as a normal excavation. Removing the accessible fuel was only the first part of the job; the tank itself still needed to be prepared, opened, cleaned and tested through a controlled make-safe process.
Making the damaged tank safe required more than removing the remaining petrol, so the response followed a planned sequence that addressed the liquid, the internal atmosphere, access to the vessel and its condition before handover.
Ideal Response was contacted late on a Tuesday, and the specialist tanker attended the following morning. The petrol recovery and tank make-safe process was completed within 24 hours, allowing the construction team to move forward with the tank-removal process.
The speed was valuable, but the more important feature of the response was the order in which the risks were dealt with. The damaged tank was not simply pumped out and handed back. Liquid recovery was followed by atmosphere control, cold cutting, internal cleaning and gas verification before the next contractor took responsibility for excavation.
The fire started in electrical equipment within a ground-floor storeroom outside normal working hours. The fire service had extinguished the fire before Ideal Response became involved.
At first glance, the worst of the damage appeared concentrated around the storeroom. Heavy black soot was clearly visible close to the seat of the fire and extended into the adjoining corridor.
But there was another indication that the problem went further.
A persistent smoke odour remained across much of the ground floor and could also be detected in parts of the first floor, including areas where very little visible soot could be seen.
That mattered because approximately 60 employees normally worked from the premises. Some staff had been relocated or were working remotely while the affected areas were unavailable.
The customer also wanted to avoid unnecessary replacement of furniture, fixtures and other items that could potentially be cleaned and retained.
Our technicians carried out a room-by-room assessment before establishing the cleaning scope.
As expected, the heaviest deposits were concentrated inside the storeroom and immediately outside it. Further inspection, however, identified fine soot particles extending beyond the obviously fire-damaged areas.
Some affected surfaces looked relatively clean from a distance. Concentrating solely on the heavily blackened surfaces around the fire would therefore not have addressed the wider contamination.
The team documented the affected areas, photographed conditions before work began and used appropriate surface assessment/testing in selected locations to help establish the extent of soot migration.
Once the extent of the contamination had been established, the team developed a staged cleaning programme.
The first priority was the controlled removal of loose particulate contamination using appropriate HEPA-filtered vacuum equipment. This came before more detailed surface cleaning.
That sequencing was deliberate.
Attempting to wet-clean loose soot immediately can risk spreading or smearing contamination across some surfaces. Removing appropriate loose particulate contamination first gave the team a better foundation for the subsequent detailed cleaning stages.
The technicians then worked systematically through the affected areas, progressing from higher-level surfaces through walls, fixtures, furniture and flooring.
Professional cleaning products and degreasers appropriate to the surfaces and contamination were used to remove adhered fire residues. Where furniture, fixtures and other contents could be successfully cleaned, the team treated them rather than automatically assuming that everything exposed to smoke needed to be discarded.
Although the fire itself had been contained to one relatively small storeroom, the final treatment area extended to approximately 650 m² because of the way smoke and fine soot had migrated through the property.
The project included the fire-affected storeroom, ground-floor corridor, six office and meeting areas, stairwell and first-floor landing.
Across five working days, visible soot and fire residues were removed from the treated areas, salvageable furniture and fixtures were cleaned where appropriate, and the persistent smoke odour was treated following the physical cleaning process.
A final inspection was completed before the treated areas were handed back. The customer could then begin returning those areas to normal use.
Visible damage doesn't necessarily define the affected area. The heaviest black soot was concentrated near the storeroom, but lighter contamination had travelled considerably further.
Cleaning sequence matters. Appropriate loose particulate contamination was removed before detailed surface cleaning, and smoke odour treatment followed the physical removal of fire residues rather than being treated as a substitute for cleaning.
Assessment should continue during the project. An additional affected area was discovered because the technicians continued checking conditions while the work progressed.
For a facilities or property manager dealing with a similar incident, the scope of fire damage cleaning shouldn't be based solely on the rooms that look visibly blackened.
If a fire has affected a commercial property, the visible damage may be only part of the problem.
Ideal Response provides fire damage cleaning, soot and ash removal, smoke damage cleaning and smoke odour treatment for commercial properties across England, supporting recovery through the specialist cleaning and restoration stages up to pre-reinstatement.
