Available 24/7 | 0800 088 4170
Available 24/7 | 0800 088 4170
The flood had affected both levels of the house, but the drying challenge extended into the construction itself. Moisture readings at sample points reached 100% WME, while checks identified the potential for water to remain within wall cavities and other concealed areas.
Several finishes also restricted evaporation. Wallpaper and paint on plasterboard ceilings, together with ceramic tiles and moisture-resistant floor finishes, could slow the release of moisture from the materials beneath them. That meant the drying plan needed to create routes for moisture to escape rather than simply adding dehumidifiers to closed rooms.
The preparation stage focused on removing materials and finishes that were either damaged or preventing effective drying. Flooring was removed through the affected areas, apart from tiles in the hallway and kitchen that the homeowner chose to retain after the associated moisture risks had been explained.
Wall finishes were stripped back where required, including wallpaper and ceramic tiles acting as vapour barriers. Damaged plasterboard, plywood and insulation were also removed from ceilings and loft areas to expose pockets of retained moisture and give the drying system access to the affected construction.
The drying and restoration programme was completed within the estimated four-week period. The affected construction was opened, treated and dried, leaving exposed surfaces ready for the next stage of repair and redecoration.
The homeowner was also kept informed about the implications of retaining the hallway and kitchen floor tiles. That decision remained part of the drying strategy rather than being treated as a separate issue, because finishes left in place can influence how readily moisture escapes from the construction beneath them.
Small access points were used for relative-humidity probes to assess conditions within wall cavities. These readings complemented the surface moisture checks and helped the team monitor areas that could not be judged reliably from appearance alone.
Once the affected construction had been opened appropriately, a tailored drying regime was installed for four weeks. Condensing dehumidifiers removed moisture released into the air, adsorption dehumidification supported drying in cooler conditions, and turbines with piping kits improved air movement and helped direct drying into materials at depth.
